Monday, November 15, 2010

Get a Flu Shot



It's always good to journal one's feelings on a regular basis. The "regular basis" shouldn't become an obsession or be something that causes anxiety when we fail to journal ... just ordinary "regular" like cleaning house or deleting old e-mails (when was the last time I did that? Cleaning house, I mean.)

However, journaling about physical feelings when those feelings include wanting to keep your head between your knees is easier said that done ... even if you put the laptop on the floor.

This is the season and the reason for the season is the virus-carriers that we can't avoid. The recent high temperatures acted like growth hormones for germs; then we came outside to bask in the sun and pass germs to each other. In other words, it's our own fault that an unfortunate number of us is sitting with our heads between our knees.

Add to that the fact that I didn't get my flu shot. By this time of year, I usually have responsibly shown up for the needle. I do the other "right" things , those that the CDC included in their Suggestion Number Two on their website, http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/preventing.htm

Number Two from the CDC
  • Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when you cough or sneeze. Throw the tissue in the trash after you use it.
  • Wash your hands often with soap and water. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub.*
  • Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth. Germs spread this way.
  • Try to avoid close contact with sick people.
  • If you are sick with flu–like illness, CDC recommends that you stay home for at least 24 hours after your fever is gone except to get medical care or for other necessities. (Your fever should be gone without the use of a fever-reducing medicine.)
  • While sick, limit contact with others as much as possible to keep from infecting them.
However, my fault lies in Suggestion Number One (Get a flu shot) and Suggestion Number Three (Use prescribed anti-virals in the first two days of illness.)

So, if you prefer to have your laptop on your lap rather than the floor, you might want to follow the suggestions of the CDC. Also, if you intend to get a prescription within the first two days of illness ... don't get sick on a Friday.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Clean Up Your Mess!

You remember when you were a child and you weren't allowed to leave the house until you cleaned up your mess? That was so unrealistic. That's not the consequences you will experience as an adult. As an adult, if you make a mess, someone is going to throw you out. Vomit on the bar? You're out! Three strikes? You're out! Cheat on the spouse? You're out! Take too many pain killers? You're out!

Maybe our mothers had the right idea. However, once we are old enough to define our defiance as other people's consequences, we reject the childhood consequences that actually made sense.

I think we should say to the duly elected representatives, "You're not allowed to leave the House until you clean up your mess!" The recently elected Republican representatives would have to get to work cleaning up their Republican doo-doo from before. To the president, "You're not allowed to leave the White House until you clean up your mess!" Yes, I realize if that had been implemented during the last presidency, we would be stuck with Bush until hell freezes over. Or maybe it would have gotten folks shoveling the ice cubes down south to Satan and the mess would have been cleaned up a lot sooner than it's going to take to clean up his mess now.

I think returning to the "You can't leave until..." consequences should become the law of the land. It might make politicians, bankers, stockbrokers, clergy and other screw-ups think more carefully about what they do.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Simple Thoughts

S & M

When I was pretty and menacing,
I wasn't manipulative -
Tried, failing miserably.
Such a dismal shame.

Hustle of Dawn

Aerial aerobics
of geese.
Aquatic jet streams
of ducks at sunrise.
Shimmering white veils
of snowy egrets.
Heron's harangue
disturbing the sun.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Emotional Eater....or Not


I know a woman who belongs to Overeaters Anonymous; she refers to herself as an "emotional eater" and frequently repeats one of the many cliche sayings that are part of any twelve-step program. "One day at a time" and "This too shall pass" are biggies amongst the many mottoes. There's more to the programs than just the sayings, but they work. ("It works if you work it.") Maybe some folks could take a drink or overeat while saying "This too shall pass;" however, the irony and the bathroom humor would crack me up. I'd probably blow the Bloody Mary or Boston cream pie out my nose. Anyway, as I was saying, this woman is a self-proclaimed "emotional eater" which begs the question....what is a non-emotional eater?

The non-emotional eater can't order from a menu. "I could care less what your specials are. Bring me anything. I just don't care."

Or the non-emotional eater might respond in a Mr. Spock-like monotone. "I'll have lamb, specifically the posterior cut of a young sheep; sheep being akin to the Greek term, "élaphos." Please don't confuse my use of the word, lamb, as meaning 'a gentle person'. I do not want the posterior end of a gentle person, nor do I want a slice of Christ. In addition, I want three-ounces of a form of a cultivated cruciferous plant, Brassica oleracea botrytis, whose leafy stalks and clusters of usually green buds are eaten as a vegetable known to the common man as 'broccoli.'

The non-emotional eater would break his Jewish mother's heart. "Who cares that you spent four hours in the kitchen with the air conditioning broken leaning your crutch against the counter while applying a tourniquet to the hand that got caught in the meat grinder? I don't want to eat dinner with you. I'm just not feeling it."

If a person has a pulse, they must be experiencing an emotion of some kind, unless the person is in a catatonic stupor. Maybe even the catatonic schizophrenic is feeling something; he just isn't going to tell us what it is. "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn," is a statement of emotion.

Therefore, I question the self-diagnosed label "emotional eater" as having anything to do with indulging in excess amounts of food. Personally, I feel emotional after I've indulged. "I am so happy that you shared a quart of Rocky Road ice cream with me. " "I'm miserable and embarrassed that I stepped up to the AYCE buffet for the third time."

Personally, I lack discipline in several areas of my life, and I am well-disciplined in others. However, I don't identify myself as an "emotional procrastinator" anymore than I am an "emotional hard-worker." While it's true that emotions motivate people toward action, I don't think that the emotion is an adequate descriptor of the action. Being non-emotional will probably not restrain someone from a habitual behavior, unless the person is catatonic or doesn't have a pulse. I'm perfectly capable of nonchalantly, apathetically approaching the buffet for the third time.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Vibrant But Not a Beauty


She was vibrant, but not a beauty. At first I didn’t notice anything at all about this woman working at the fabric store.

I handed her the four bolts of fabric and requested a quarter yard of each one. As she unrolled the first bolt and measured my meager request, I told her that I was making the first quilt for myself. Not wanting to appear a novice, I added that I had made other quilts, but this was the first one just for me. “I already have lots of fabric, but I liked these.” She glanced at me and we both laughed. Quilters always have lots of fabric, but always want more. “My quilt will be a variety of browns and dark reds.” Then I added, “I like those colors.” She nodded as she snipped a perfect cut. Feeling a little foolish about filling the silence with chatter as she worked, I decided to just shut up.

I watched her as she rolled and pinned the remaining fabric back onto the first bolt. Then, without looking up from her work, she said, “The darker colors help me to find my center, to feel grounded.”

There was a moment when I couldn’t respond; I could only look at this woman. I was trying to process this incongruency, a haggard-looking woman and a Zen-like observation. She was probably ten years younger than I am, but she looked much older. She was far too thin, no make-up, and her thin wisps of mousy brown hair hung down in her face as she leaned over the fabric. Her faded jeans hung straight, no hips, no thighs. As I stood in a moment of suspended reality, her words echoed in my mind. “The darker colors help me to find my center, to feel grounded.”

Suddenly we were both animated, sharing with each about the projects we had done and the ones we intend to do. She continued to cut, fold and pin as she talked about a wall hanging that she had seen and wanted to make one similar to it. It was a quilted wall hanging, a grand piano with a long-stemmed red rose lain across it. She talked about its elegance and that she wanted to make hers in black and red silk.

As she talked about the sheen of the silk, the contrast of black and red on a white background, the way black and red combinations pull together all the other colors in a room, I looked again at her hands. Her hands were dry and rough with several scabs and scars, probably cut and poked by scissors and needles. As if she knew my thoughts, she told me about the hand quilting she kept nearby when she was at home. “You have to be very efficient and disciplined to quilt by hand,” she said. “Otherwise, a project would never be finished.”

When she handed me the four carefully folded pieces of fabric, I thanked her for the conversation. Thanking her felt so inadequate. I felt lighter. I felt centered. I had been in the presence of a wise woman, a vibrant woman, though not a beauty.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Insulting a Sweet Potato


I spoke to a sweet potato yesterday. Insulted him, really. I looked him in the eyes and said, “Oh my, you’re an ugly little fellow.” He didn’t reply, as far as I know. After insulting him, I immediately stuck him in the microwave so he really didn’t have time for a comeback. If he had a second or two to think about it, he might have said, “Beauty is ephemeral; my sweetness is eternal.” That would have put me in my place, of course, but then I would also have had to deal with the reality that not only had I insulted a sweet potato, but had been humbled by one as well.


As it was, I had only to come to grips with the fact that on the third day of being housebound by a very deep snow drift across my driveway, I had finally succumbed to cabin fever, the “talking-to-vegetable” type of cabin fever which is considerably more tolerable than becoming a vegetable-while-talking.


There has been an odd variation of snow depth in my front yard. There are areas where I can see tufts of grass, still green, poking through the snow. In other places, there are snowdrifts over a foot deep. One of those snowdrifts stopped just before coming up against the door of my Ford van. Otherwise, I wouldn’t have been able to get in the van each of the three snowbound days to know that the battery was still charged (a moot point, since I couldn’t go anywhere.) There was over a foot of snow in front of my van.


Occasionally, I entertained thoughts of bundling up and attacking the problem with my snow shovel (assuming the storage shed was free of a snowdrift.) Then I found it more entertaining to cook and bake (and eat) as well as to read and quilt. I enjoyed what I was doing and got a lot done.


However, I didn’t think about writing more than a nanosecond or two (does the second nanosecond really need to be mentioned?) I know that some writers find inclement weather useful to their craft. For example, Tom Robbins (Even Cowgirls Get the Blues) wrote in his book of essays (the title was something about geese, maybe ducks, flying backward?) that his hometown, Seattle, is a perfect setting for a writer because of the dismal weather. That works for him but apparently not for me.


To write, I need to be un-bound. Lacking the discipline to write because I should write, I need to be free to choose to write. I need to know that while I could breeze off into the day with a bundle of impulses and no objective at hand that I, instead, freely chose to set up my laptop on my table. (They should be called tabletops because it’s ridiculous trying to keyboard on wobbly, flabby thighs.) I write because I choose to write. (This is of no help in actually finishing my novel, but such is the price one pays for freedom.)


Therefore, I didn’t write this entry for my blog (even though every day in my planner since the first of the year includes the message to myself to blog) until the evening after my grandson and I dug out the driveway, scattered salt over the icy patches, and rewarded ourselves with oatmeal cookies. No sweet potato pie. I’m giving the ugly little fellows a break until the next blizzard.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Descendants of Survivors


We are the descendants of ancestral human survivors. We can all agree with this statement (which I may have lifted, but don't remember the source) regardless of our confidence in the evidence of scientists or our faith in the dogma of theologians.

The conscious thought that we exist (at least until we no longer exist) is the raw material with which we establish ourselves as thinking, feeling, behaving organisms on a planet whose origin is unknown and its future unsettled. The only certainty is our past and maybe our present (except that as I typed the word "present," it, too, became part of my past.)

However, at no other time does the past assume such importance in our consciousness as when we acknowledge the passing of someone we love. This week, I attended a funeral service. During the meal following the funeral (there's always a meal because it take so much energy to survive the present...or was it the past?), my relatives (LOTS of cousins) and I talked about our past...mostly the silly things like the near-drownings as children, the joys of humiliating each other, and more somber events like remembrances of actual loss.

So much of the socialization of my cousins and myself (being shaped, poked, and cattle-prodded into adulthood) was a shared process and the process was influenced by so many of the same people. Yet the twenty or so people sitting around the table looked to me to be so different from one another (other than the baggy eyes, a persistent, pervasive family trait) and, in some ways, looked to be strangers to me. For all the talking, what do we really know about each other and what secrets will we carry with us until the time of our own passing and (bed, bath,) and beyond?

A few months ago, I tagged along with my mother to a writer's group that she has been attending for the last five months. During this same time, I was trying to start a local writer's group and was completely unaware of her group and writing activities. Isn't it ironic that two closely genetically related people, both interested in communication, both living in the same small town failed to communicate this information to each other before?

One of the most tumultuous relationships I was in was with a man who was a manager of human resource managers. At the time, I was working as a psychologist. In other words, we both worked in fields whose essential feature was communication. However, our relationship was stormy because our problem was a failure in communication. (Go figure.)

Back to the past, what exactly do we really know about our ancestral human survivors (cave dwellers or more recent twigs on the family tree)? Perhaps they survived because they wore masks, kept secrets, realized that the present moment (no matter how joyful or sorrowful) passes as quickly as it came, and because they didn't spend a lot of time dwelling on their awareness (unknown to other animals) of (bed,bath, and) beyond. The cave dwellers buried the dead, had a meal, and made a few markings on a wall...as I've just done...and hoped that their descendants treasure the past, enjoy the moment (now in the past), and try to not screw up the future any worse than they did.

To not communicate causes inconvenience at the least and failed relationships at the worst (though some of them ought to fail), but sometimes its better not to know too much. Knowing too much about each other and (bed, bath) beyond takes all the thrill out of survival.

There is an old saying that the shoemaker's children has no shoes. I think this saying may be applicable to communication, but I'm not sure how to say it. The End (but not yet bed, bath, and beyond.)